Surely, the proposed law spreads around nice words such as responsibility, healthcare, freedom, choice, development, rights, equality, couples, etc. Yet, it is nothing but an attempt to remove God from our government and society.
When I told a friend that lines, he answered: "grabe naman kasi kayo, masyado kayong overreacting, masyado nyong ginagawang literal ang mga sciptures. sa sobrang pagkaliteral, yung mga sentiments na rinerelease nila, wala na sa lugar... hindi naman sa masyado kong crinicriticize pero you're going beyond limits... kung walang RH Bill, kaya bang pakainin ng simbahan lahat ng mga batang dadagdag sa listahan ng mahihirap sa buong Pilipinas? kaya ba nilang ipagamot? kaya nilang pag-aralin, as in lahat?"
Yeah, I know. It's really hard to reply to that, lalo na at opinyon nya yun. I just ask him, "don't you think the bill will legalized abortion?"
"Finance everyone's freedom to have sex responsibility. We can support RH Bill and implements parental responsibility and still be a good Catholic," he answered callously.
When it comes to this part, we started to have different views toward it. And it is always a constant reminder that, we should read first the entire proposed bill before giving reactions. As for my own opinion, not because I'm Catholic or because of what the scriptures tell us, I really can't accept the part wherein they give free condoms (to high school students) to those out of wedlock. "There's only two words much better than condom and pills for you (esp. the teens today) it's called wedding ring.
All of us for sure are pro-life! Maybe some can't because of poverty and great responsibility. Come to think of it, the bill cannot be pro-life because of many sections in the bill that promote harm than health, promote injustice rather that a greater good, and do not respect the solemn union of spouses in marriage. I just realized that being an anti means PRO-QUALITY LIFE.
No, I'm not saying that we want changes but we're not open to it. As long as it's for the good of entire human kind, why not?
Please before acting, reflect on it: the bill will just induce sexual gratification on teen. I agree that married couples should be introduced with some options but I think, the teens should be taught SELF- CONTROL. Many teen would engage in casual sex or premarital sex if the part of the bill that teaches birth control on teens wouldn't be amended.
“What is needed, among other things, are the proper education of couples with regards to the value of marriage, spousal relationship, responsible parenthood and the use of natural family planning methods that do not have any harmful side-effects, have a higher success rate than artificial means, and foster deeper communication, care and respect between couples." IT'S CALLED DISCIPLINE.
Don't used the reason that our country are overpopulated. NO, WE'RE NOT OVERPOPULATED, WE'RE NOT JUST PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED.
CONDOMS CAN PREVENT DISEASE AND UNPLANNED PREGNANCY. And let’s face it, sex is more fun when you’re not worried about getting pregnant or getting an STD. “Condom is not the solution to our problems. It does not even make the people responsible.” As what Pabillo said, “It’s like you can do whatever you want because you’re ‘protected’ anyway. But does it really protect you? Again, sexual act outside marriage is wrong."
Don't be too advance-thinker, are you 100% sure it will end poverty? Do you really think that would be the best solution? Right now, (when I say right now, I really mean NOW) we're all rich, we're living a God-nurtured country. Maybe most people used it the wrong way or they just don't use it at all.
P.S. focus on addressing the causes of mortality rates, insufficient nutrition, safe water and a cleaner environment instead (:
And then let's add a disclaimer:
This note is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement the wishes and no responsibility for any unintended emotional stress this note may bring.
WALANG MAHIRAP, KUNG MARUNONG TAYONG LAHAT NG SALITANG "SHARE"!
